
http://www.thecoolhunter.net/images/stories/_2006/PICS/lmvh.jpg" /> src="http://www.thecoolhunter.net/images/stories/_2006/PICS/lmvh.jpg" />
THE POLITE, GENTEEL WORLD OF LUXURY GOODS HAS
BEEN turned on its head by Frenchman Bernard Arnault. The New York
Times describes him as a man who has “built an empire out of
companies he pried, for the most part, from the resistant grasps of
others, one by one.”
Born in Roubaix in northern France in
1949, Arnault attended the prestigious École Polytechnique and earned
a reputation for being studious rather than social. He was raised by
his strict Catholic grandmother and worked in the family property and
construction business, including stints selling real estate on the
French Riviera and in Florida. At twenty-five he was CEO of a company
with one thousand staff members. Arnault was influenced by the American
can-do approach to business, a far cry from the more conservative
French approach. He is now the richest man in France and among the
top-ten richest people in the world, with an estimated fortune of $20
billion. According to Forbes magazine estimates, his net worth will
triple between 2003 and 2005. His family now owns 48 percent of Louis
Vuitton Möet Hennessy. He presides over a $40.5 billion empire of the
world’s most prestigious brands, including Louis Vuitton (the most
profitable luxury brand in the world), Christian Dior, Guerlain,
Givenchy, and Möet et Chandon, with interests in wine, fashion, retail,
jewelry, leather goods, perfume, and beauty products. In 2004 the group
had sales of more than $15.1 billion. In 1984, the former property
developer entered the luxury goods business when he invested $15
million of family money in buying a bankrupt textile company called
Boussac, as part of an $80 million deal with a consortium of investors.
The portfolio included the unprofitable Christian Dior brand and a
diaper company called Peaudouce. Arnault believed that Dior was worth
salvaging. He sold off most of the Boussac companies, unceremoniously
culled half of the company’s sixteen-thousand-strong workforce and
began building his empire, one brand at a time. Arnault was cashed up,
thanks to the sale of the diaper business, which netted $400 million.
He
set his sights on the French bastion of luxury, Louis Vuitton Möet
Hennessy, executing a hostile takeover in 1988 that cemented his
reputation as the “wolf in cashmere clothing.” His takeover style
involved his holding
companies buying up stock and then, with 45 to
60 percent of the company equity, taking over. Then it was on to the
next acquisition. When Arnault took over LVMH, the group controlled ten
luxury brands; now it owns more than fifty, including Chateau
d’Yquem, Celine, Christian Lacroix, Dom Perignon, Bon March√©, TAG
Heuer, Domaine Chandon, Hennessy Cognac, St. Emilion, and Glenmorangie.
LVMH is also involved in joint ventures with DeBeers and DFS duty-free
stores.
Arnault calls his company a “federation” of brands.
He has built his luxury goods empire on his two favorite things:
creative force and hard-nosed business, principles he calls “the
artist’s vision and the logic of worldwide marketing.‚Äù Arnault buys
the history, tradition, prestige, and recognition of a brand and takes
it from there. He reinvigorates each brand, not just the products
themselves but the business from end to end, the design, the
manufacturing (all brought back in-house to maintain quality control),
the distribution (no licensing, all in-house) and sales, all with the
help of impossibly glamorous, high-end advertising campaigns
and the right celebrity endorsements. The transformation must also include tight cost controlling for higher profit margins.
Under
Arnault, every stage of the manufacturing of a purse is meticulously
planned for high productivity. “If you control your factories, you
control your quality: if you control your distribution, you control
your image,” he says. Each business is kept separate and independent,
but there is synergy between them. If one knows of good leather
supplies, or a better way to make a product, then there is
cross-pollination and all the little brands add up to a superpower.
In
more recent times, Arnault has talked publicly about his “star
brands” theory, explaining how they take time to grow, how they need
heritage. Arnault estimates that it takes a decade to build or rebuild
a brand into what he calls a “star brand,” that is, a brand that is
“timeless, modern, fast-growing, and highly profitable.” Arnault
describes the compelling offer to customers of his star brands: “You
feel you must buy it, in fact, or else you won’t be in the moment.
You will be left behind.” He argues that the history and tradition of
a brand are not enough. Aristocratic links and status certainly help a
brand, but they do not guarantee a star brand that makes products that
people have to have now, right now.
For his brands to move out
of their comfort zones, Arnault had to do things differently. He
removed the almost sacred designer Hubert de Givenchy from Givenchy and
brought in twenty-seven year-old Saville Row tailor and British
bad boy Alexander McQueen. Similarly he hired British fashion devil
John Galliano to take over as chief designer at Dior. Arnault says he
is only interested in the youngest, brightest, and the most talented.
Since Galliano came on board, he may have presented some outrageous
collections— one inspired by the homeless of Paris, another with a
1950smeets- ancient-Egypt theme—but Dior sales have quadrupled under
Galliano’s
creative direction. ‚ÄúI don’t care what they do as long as it’s on
the front page,” says Arnault, who has had the Dior haute couture
shows rescheduled to the afternoon so the show’s images can make the
evening news and the next day’s newspapers. Arnault estimates that it
took six years to transform the Dior brand “froma fashion dowager
duchess to a young hipster.”
To keep the LVMH juggernaut
firing, Arnault has surrounded himself not with fashion sycophants but
with experienced executives from multinationals who understand the
business world outside fashion realms. Though when he interviews senior
executives for roles in his companies, he is said to set out one
hundred ties and asks candidates to choose ten. If they pick bad ties,
they must go on to the scarf test. If they choose badly again, there is
little chance of them getting a job. Arnault wants staff with the
business skills and good taste to help sell a dream to the world. No
one needs a $5,000 hand-stitched purse, but for many across all races
and demographics, it is an object of enormous desire. And creating
desire is what luxury goods retailers must do. Says Arnault: “Our
products are about making people dream. We take it really seriously.”
By Emily Ross & Angus Holland – exclusive extract from
100 Great Businesses & the minds behind them. Buy
online